Are Rising Mental Health Claims a Sign of Things to Come

Our Thinking / Healthcare /

Are Rising Mental Health Claims a Sign of Things to Come
Calendar17 November 2015

In a review of claims data for almost 100 Mercer employer clients, representing approximately 2.5 million members, we found that the Mental Health and Substance Abuse per member per year cost trend (for allowed charges) rose nearly 11%, in stark contrast to overall medical PMPY trend of 3.5%. And while MH/SA claims represent a small percentage of the overall medical claim costs (4%), a spike in the cost may be a symptom of a larger issue – and an opportunity for employers to get out in front. What’s driving this trend?

  • More people – 3.4% increase in the MH/SA unique claimants.
  • More claims per person – 7.5% increase in MH/SA claims per claimant.
  • Fewer claimants are using out of network (OON) MH/SA providers but the total OON visits are increasing by 7.5% -- and the average allowable amount per visit is twice as high for OON providers ($2,097) than for in-network ($1,019).

One factor behind the increase in OON utilization may be adult dependents added under the ACA, who tend to live outside the primary member’s area and use OON services at a higher rate.

But the biggest driver of increased OON utilization may simply be limited access. Mental Health Parity has increased both visibility and pressure to increase access. We are seeing members access care more than ever before. And more employers are recognizing the importance of behavioral health in the benefit offering; they are increasing the number of EAP visits allowed and adding onsite counselors. Some specialty areas in particular experience access issues, such as psychiatry – both adult and child/adolescent.

The shortage of providers has led a growing number to choose not to join networks -- because they don’t have to. With access to in-network providers limited not just in rural markets but also in busy urban areas, more plan members may be making a choice to use out-of-network providers, albeit at a lower benefit level.

What are the possible interventions?

  • If the underlying cause is access, collaborate with your networks about their strategy for contracting with providers; promote and leverage the EAP; and explore mental health resources available through telemedicine vendors.
  • If the underlying cause is literacy, focus on member education, particularly if there are patterns by region or for covered adult dependents where in-network providers may not be evident or readily available. Also promote EAP and other resources that may be available to support members with mental health, substance abuse and/or stress related needs.
  • Engage care management and advocacy support vendors in promoting in network and EAP resources; also validate their attention to the co-morbidities of mental health in their engagement contacts.

But before you start down any of these paths, look at your data to find out:

  • Is your MHSA spend increasing?
  • Is it MH or SA or both driving the increase in trend?
  • Is it unit cost, number of claimants and/or number of claims per claimant?
  • Are there patterns by location, job type or relationship to the covered employee?
  • Are current resources such as the EAP being optimized?
  • Are there employee surveys that suggest high rates of stress?

The more answers you have, the better equipped you will be to develop an approach that strikes the right balance between what people need and how the plan meets those needs.

  Register for Mercer US Health News to receive weekly e-mail updates.
*Required Fields